Cureus | A Modified Tension Band Fixation Technique for the Management of Patellar Fractures Using Crossed Pins and a Lateral Parapatellar Approach

2022-05-14 17:12:33 By : Mr. Jack Jiang

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.

The SIQ for this article will be revealed

lateral approach, crossed pins, tension band, fractures, patella

Cite this article as: Poutoglidou F, Krkovic M (April 28, 2022) A Modified Tension Band Fixation Technique for the Management of Patellar Fractures Using Crossed Pins and a Lateral Parapatellar Approach. Cureus 14(4): e24546. doi:10.7759/cureus.24546

The use of the tension band technique for patellar fracture fixation has been associated with a loss of the rigidity of the construct after cyclic loading. Biomechanical studies have shown the biomechanical superiority of the crossed pin configuration relative to the traditional parallel one. Here, we describe a modified tension band technique that involves the use of crossed pins and a figure-of-eight passed as close to the bone as possible through a lateral parapatellar approach. The basic surgical technique and our case series are reviewed.

The tension band technique relies on the principle that applying an implant, such as a wire or a plate, on the tension side of the bone results in the conversion of the tensile forces into compression forces, provided that the compression cortex is sufficient [1]. Tension band wiring for patellar fractures has been associated with a loss of the rigidity of the construct after cyclic loading [2-4].

The patellofemoral joint is a highly complex structure. First, the contact area between the patella and the femoral condyles increases and moves proximally during flexion [5]. Second, the patellofemoral joint reaction force is variable and depends on several factors, including the knee joint angle, the muscle tension, and the distance between the center of gravity and the joint [6]. Finally, patellar tracking is a very complicated motion that involves shift, rotation, and tilt [7]. The patella slides on a convex surface [8], which results in an uneven distribution of the forces in its anterior and posterior cortex. Although a parallel k-wire configuration may achieve adequate compression on the posterior surface of the patella, some displacement will occur on the anterior surface. A recent biomechanical study has shown that a crossed k-wire configuration provides greater fixation stiffness under cyclic loading and improves interfragmentary compression compared to the traditional parallel one [9].

Here, we describe a modified tension band technique for the management of patellar fractures. The technique involves a crossed pin configuration and a lateral parapatellar approach.

Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs are obtained, as well as a CT scan if needed. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopy. The patient is placed in a supine position and a tourniquet is applied to the proximal thigh (surgeon’s preference). A lateral parapatellar approach is performed, in particular, an anterolateral approach is made (Figure 1), followed by lateral parapatellar arthrotomy and exposure of the fracture margins. Next, two 1.6-2.0 mm k-wires are inserted for the proximal fragment from proximal and lateral and exit in the centre of the fragment, and for the distal fragment from distal and lateral to the centre of the fragment. Both wires are aimed close and parallel to the cartilage/subchondral bone for both fragments (Figure 2). At this stage, fragments are reduced and retained in place with a pointed reduction forceps. The k-wires are then progressed into the opposite fragments with a power tool until they both exit the opposite fragment (1-2 cm max) on the medial side. The wires will exit into the quadriceps/patellar tendon and will not be directly visible. The reduction is verified with palpation of the retropatellar surface through the lateral parapatellar approach. An image intensifier (direct, lateral, and oblique views) is used to verify the reduction and the appropriate placement of the k-wires. Care is taken to avoid k-wires crossing at the level of the fracture, as this may compromise rotational stability. Whether wires are bracing the joint/articular cartilage is decided based on direct examination and not on an image intensifier.

K-wires are inserted for the proximal fragment from proximal and lateral and exit in the centre of the fragment and for distal fragment from distal and lateral to the centre of the fragment. Both wires are aimed close and parallel to the subchondral bone. Red arrows: direction of the pins.

Small vertical incisions are made through the quadriceps and patellar tendons on the medial side to identify the k-wires. When identified, the k-wires are backed out to allow just enough length to allow the passage of a secure tension band wire. Tension band wire is then placed in the standard way but has to go through the tendons to minimize the potential of the tension band wire cutting through the tendon on tensioning. The author’s preferred method is to put the wire first on the proximal fragment from medial to lateral, followed by the distal fragment from lateral to medial. Appropriate management of the tension band wire is required to prevent unnecessary repetitions of the task. Tension band wire is tensioned using a standard tensioning method. When it is confirmed that the tension wire is in the appropriate place behind both k-wires on the medial side of the patella, both k-wires are bent, rotated into the correct position, and backed out to get the loop of the k-wires as close to the patella as possible. The same is repeated on the lateral side, with the main caveat that the k-wires should be cut at the appropriate length and bent directly into the most appropriate position, and that twisting of the wires will affect the position of loops on the medial side. Incisions in the tendons are closed with a reabsorable suture. The final reduction is confirmed by palpating the joint from inside through the lateral arthrotomy if the joint laxity allows. Finally, the position of the k-wires and the figure-of-8 are checked with the image intensified and the wound is closed in layers.

Full weight-bearing is typically initiated immediately post-surgery. Patients have a hinged knee brace locked in extension for two weeks. The brace is opened in progressively increasing flexion two weeks post-surgery.

Six patients with patellar fractures were treated operatively with this technique. Four of the patients were male, and two of them were female. The mean age of the patients was 41.17 years (a range of 20-60). Five of the patients had comminuted fractures, and one of them had a transverse fracture pattern. There were no intraoperative complications. The average follow-up of the patients was 7.83 months (range 2-22). Radiographic union was achieved in all patients, and there were no infections. None of the patients complained of stiffness, anterior knee pain, or symptomatic hardware. One of the patients had an implant removed. This patient, however, had concomitant lower limb fractures and multiple operations in the following months. Representative X-rays of patients treated with the crossed pins tension band technique are shown in Figures 3-4. Figure 5 demonstrates a healed patellar fracture four months postoperatively.

The tension band technique has been associated with high complication rates and an early mobilization may require a more rigid construct. Several studies have shown a displacement in the fracture site after cyclic loading [2,3], and the reason for this may be the fact that forces act on different areas of the patella through knee flexion. Patella tracking occurs on a convex surface, and fracture displacement on the anterior surface of the patella is inevitable. Crossed pins have been mainly used in the management of phalangeal and paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures and, in both cases, they have been shown to increase stability. Accordingly, a crossed pin configuration may confer a more rigid construct in patella fractures that could resist fragment displacement during flexion. Indeed, Lenihan et al. demonstrated a significantly smaller fracture gap displacement with the use of crossed pins compared to conventional parallel ones [9]. It should be noted that the crossed pin technique does not contradict the AO principles since, according to AO, the resistance to displacement comes from the cerclage wire and not from the pins that act mainly as anchoring points.

A biomechanical study by Baran et al. showed that for optimal stabilization, the tension force transfer should be done directly on the bone and that interposed tendinous tissue reduces stability [10]. Accordingly, in this modified technique, the figure-of-8 wire passes as close to the bone as possible. This way, we increased the stability of the construct and, at the same time, reduced soft tissue trauma. Regarding the approach used, the traditional mid-axial longitudinal approach does not allow palpation of the retropatellar surface. On the other hand, a lateral parapatellar approach not only allows palpation of the articular surface but at the same time decreases the risk of infection since, with this approach, the hardware is not directly under the incision, the incision is smaller, and it involves less soft tissue trauma.

In conclusion, the tension band technique for the management of patella fractures has been associated with many complications. In this study, we present a modified tension band method with a crossed pin configuration and through a lateral parapatellar approach. Although only a limited number of patients were treated with this technique, the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes are very promising. The crossed pin tension band technique follows sound biomechanical principles, is reproducible, and yields satisfactory outcomes.

Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, GBR

Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, GBR

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust issued approval Clinical Project ID4370 PRN10370. This project was approved by the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust Ethics Committee. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Poutoglidou F, Krkovic M (April 28, 2022) A Modified Tension Band Fixation Technique for the Management of Patellar Fractures Using Crossed Pins and a Lateral Parapatellar Approach. Cureus 14(4): e24546. doi:10.7759/cureus.24546

Peer review began: April 18, 2022 Peer review concluded: April 26, 2022 Published: April 28, 2022

© Copyright 2022 Poutoglidou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

K-wires are inserted for the proximal fragment from proximal and lateral and exit in the centre of the fragment and for distal fragment from distal and lateral to the centre of the fragment. Both wires are aimed close and parallel to the subchondral bone. Red arrows: direction of the pins.

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.

This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)

High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.

Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)

Already have an account? Sign in.

Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.

By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.